|
INTRODUCTION
Slovenia is a land with good potential for
economic growth, and is therefore a candidate to enter the
EU among the first group of countries.
During the past few years the area has seen satisfactory growth
trends both from the social and manufacturing point of view,
which is above all, but not only, a result of the efforts
made by the country's public institutions: it is also due
to the determination of businesses and citizens to attain
growth levels nearer and nearer to those of their European
"cousins". In the circumstances, the results achieved so far
may be considered to be the physiological outcome of the efforts
that have been made. Now, however, the country has come to
a crossroads: the question is whether to keep up growth at
an average rate or to make a radical improvement, trying to
support quantitative growth with growth of a more qualitative
nature.
During the previous Interreg II Italy - Slovenia programme
the Study Centre of the Mestre C.G.I.A. (Association of Craftsmen
and Small Companies) did research to evaluate the possibilities
of developing trade relations between the Province of Venice
and Slovenia. Some Slovene opinion leaders were interviewed
during the course of this study (Chamber of Commerce and Craft
Chamber executives), and all agreed that their country needed
to put cooperation policies into practice to open up new export
markets. This was to be done not only as a result of inter-business
cooperation but also by creating new professional skills in
order to provide a better response to the requirements of
foreign clients and to be in a position to meet the need for
different quality and product standards.
The study showed that there was great potential for collaboration
in this field: at the moment Slovenia accounts for 15% of
the exports of Venetian firms that include this country among
their customers, even 30% for trading firms. These contacts
arise from requests by Slovene companies, which, however,
are not always able to provide products with the desired characteristics.
Another finding was that the greatest obstacle pointed out
by Slovene businessmen is the lack of knowledge of the Venice
area and of the Veneto Region in general (the survey was conducted
with more than 100 Venetian and Slovene businesses).
These considerations are the grounds for believing that the
fundamental task for this area is greater specification of
the professional skills that have to be fostered further to
intensify the existing collaboration.
In the preceding study the Venice area was
only analysed from the point of view of its main economic
characteristics, in order to understand the dynamics of import
and export flows.
The aim of the new study will be to make a specific, detailed
investigation of the economic structure that characterises
homogeneous areas, if not single municipalities, in the Province
of Venice. What we wish to bring out is the presence of manufacturing
specialisations that, from a labour market angle, may point
to specific job needs that mean the selection of personnel
with the professional training necessary to do skilled work
that is essential for the prevailing activity in the area.
In the Slovene areas the part of the previous study that described
the individual regions will be integrated by sections that
focus exclusively on the local labour market.
Display of PDF
|